12.31.07 | Cryptorthography Contest Update
A bit more than a month ago, I posted about Cryptorthography and mentioned the possibility of a Cryptorthography contest. Well, the response in comments has been really impressive, and as such, I can confirm that such a contest will be happening.
Although I’m still up in the air about the form of the contest, I’ve got a few ideas, but I’m open to suggestions for rules. Consider the comments thread to be a sounding board for format ideas.
So, start working on your systems, it’ll be only a matter of time before they’re put to the test!
Tagged with Followups, Site News | 2 Comments
Comments
Leave a Comment
If you would like to make a comment, please fill out the form below.
Site Information
Search all posts
Tags
- Computers and Software (12)
- Conventional Linguistics (95)
- Computational Linguistics (4)
- Dialects and Idiolects (6)
- Etymology (2)
- Language Acquisition (4)
- Language Change (8)
- Linguistic Anthropology (4)
- Phonetic Phriends (3)
- Phonetics and Phonology (20)
- Psycholinguistics (4)
- Sociolinguistics (22)
- Translation and Translation Theory (10)
- Words, Phrases, and Idioms (27)
- Language and Thought (10)
- Language Censorship (3)
- Language Creation (6)
- Language Humor (25)
- Language Usage (76)
- Linguistic Mysticism (10)
- Notes (47)
- Reader Questions (2)
- Recommended Links (1)
Language Sites and Blogs
Linguistics and Language Resources
Links for Corrections
Unrelated-yet-awesome
Archives
- June 2010
- March 2010
- September 2009
- March 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
Site features
- Entries RSS
- Comments RSS
- Powered by Wordpress
- Theme based on Vertigo Squared.
- Hosting by Joyent
A couple of thoughts on Cryptorthography and your contest.
Even a relatively simple cipher can offer some real protection in certain situations. I scribble private notes to myself in meetings in a slightly modified futhark. I know lots of people who can decipher it relatively well, given time, but I don’t know (or know of) anyone who can read it upside down at a glance–I’m always shocked when people are shocked that I can read (English) upside down or backwards at about half speed (which, being a bibliophile, is pretty fast). I always assume that others can read anything in their native language that they can see. Any system that requires even minimal analysis requires more time than a passing glance will allow.
As for the contest, you have to consider requirements on length and content, especially length. Otherwise, I would submit “XDF OPQ” and even tell you that it’s a simple substitution cypher in English. Decipherment is impossible, because it could be any pair of three letter words without any letters in common, and I don’t even have to decide what they are until all the “solving” is done and I choose something that makes all the guesses wrong.
Limiting content in some way also makes decoding the Cryptorthography samples more feasible. It’s so much harder to decode when you have no idea what the subject matter even could be.
Ha! I just had (what I think is) a great idea. The sample of your Cryptorthography for the contest should be a snippet that *explains* your Cryptorthography system! That makes solutions somewhat self-verifying, limits content in a meaningful but not overly restrictive way, and makes sure every entrant has something relevant to say on the subject. Decoded samples should explicitly exclude any non-Latin symbols or characters (it’s not fair, in a contest, to let use-vs-mention complicate the decoding even more!) The length of the unencoded original text should be some fixed length range: 50-150 words?
Thanks for the nice mental romp..
I realize its been almost a year and a half since you suggested this contest, but I only JUST stumbled upon your wonderful blog today. I’m wondering if you’d perhaps consider bringing the idea back to life? I’d be game!