<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A truly divine suffix: -mancy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Apr 2012 22:47:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/comment-page-1/#comment-1268</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/#comment-1268</guid>
		<description>This is a great one too.  http://www.esotericvillage.com/mysticwords.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a great one too.  <a href="http://www.esotericvillage.com/mysticwords.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.esotericvillage.com/mysticwords.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/comment-page-1/#comment-1243</link>
		<dc:creator>will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 04:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/#comment-1243</guid>
		<description>&quot;Pyro&quot; tends to stand for &quot;fire&quot;, &quot;aqua&quot; for water.  Is that what you&#039;re asking?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Pyro&#8221; tends to stand for &#8220;fire&#8221;, &#8220;aqua&#8221; for water.  Is that what you&#8217;re asking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bubbless</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/comment-page-1/#comment-1235</link>
		<dc:creator>bubbless</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 01:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/#comment-1235</guid>
		<description>what im lost to is thw fact im writeting a book....and what i am missing is the trm &#039;mancy&#039;  like  &quot;pyromancy&quot; &quot;aquamancy&quot; what elements come from this???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what im lost to is thw fact im writeting a book&#8230;.and what i am missing is the trm &#8216;mancy&#8217;  like  &#8220;pyromancy&#8221; &#8220;aquamancy&#8221; what elements come from this???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Etymology vs. Entomology : Notes from a Linguistic Mystic</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/comment-page-1/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>Etymology vs. Entomology : Notes from a Linguistic Mystic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/#comment-361</guid>
		<description>[...] is a really fascinating area. I&#8217;ve posted many times about different word origins (here, here and here, to start), and I&#8217;ll likely continue to do so, as they&#8217;re usually pretty [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a really fascinating area. I&#8217;ve posted many times about different word origins (here, here and here, to start), and I&#8217;ll likely continue to do so, as they&#8217;re usually pretty [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/#comment-320</guid>
		<description>Scapulomancy!

I wonder if -mancy is cognate to Latin mens or mentis : mind, thought, intention, intellect?

Awesome site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scapulomancy!</p>
<p>I wonder if -mancy is cognate to Latin mens or mentis : mind, thought, intention, intellect?</p>
<p>Awesome site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/comment-page-1/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 15:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/#comment-302</guid>
		<description>-mancy is also being hijacked for use in games and stories dealing with magic in general.  For example, a webcomic about a fantasy boardgame world: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.giantitp.com/comics/erf0040.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Erfworld&lt;/a&gt; has created the words &quot;Stuffamancy&quot; and &quot;Lookamancy&quot; and many others implying not divination, but simply &quot;magic dealing with X&quot;.

In fantasy role playing -mancy half the time is used correctly because it is using historical words, but in new formations it tends to have the &quot;magic dealing with-&quot; meaning instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-mancy is also being hijacked for use in games and stories dealing with magic in general.  For example, a webcomic about a fantasy boardgame world: <a href="http://www.giantitp.com/comics/erf0040.html" rel="nofollow">Erfworld</a> has created the words &#8220;Stuffamancy&#8221; and &#8220;Lookamancy&#8221; and many others implying not divination, but simply &#8220;magic dealing with X&#8221;.</p>
<p>In fantasy role playing -mancy half the time is used correctly because it is using historical words, but in new formations it tends to have the &#8220;magic dealing with-&#8221; meaning instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/comment-page-1/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 05:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/#comment-281</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s actually kinda cool, in my opinion.  Lots of people are aware of how they&#039;re used, but very few recognize them as such.  

I&#039;m sorry you have to deal with it, though.  I&#039;m having trouble imagining teaching it to Third Graders, that must be an interesting curriculum.  

Thanks for the interesting comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s actually kinda cool, in my opinion.  Lots of people are aware of how they&#8217;re used, but very few recognize them as such.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry you have to deal with it, though.  I&#8217;m having trouble imagining teaching it to Third Graders, that must be an interesting curriculum.  </p>
<p>Thanks for the interesting comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Riley</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/comment-page-1/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 04:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/#comment-280</guid>
		<description>Derivational suffixes are taught in 3rd grade with accordance to the California Department of Education Content Standards for English Language Arts.  It&#039;s a tough concept to teach them, but they get it after much review.  hard to believe such a concept is required teaching at that level.  (I teach 3rd grade)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derivational suffixes are taught in 3rd grade with accordance to the California Department of Education Content Standards for English Language Arts.  It&#8217;s a tough concept to teach them, but they get it after much review.  hard to believe such a concept is required teaching at that level.  (I teach 3rd grade)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

