<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A truly divine suffix: -mancy</title>
	<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:35:07 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Etymology vs. Entomology : Notes from a Linguistic Mystic</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/#comment-361</link>
		<dc:creator>Etymology vs. Entomology : Notes from a Linguistic Mystic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:17:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/#comment-361</guid>
		<description>[...] is a really fascinating area. I&#8217;ve posted many times about different word origins (here, here and here, to start), and I&#8217;ll likely continue to do so, as they&#8217;re usually pretty [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] is a really fascinating area. I&#8217;ve posted many times about different word origins (here, here and here, to start), and I&#8217;ll likely continue to do so, as they&#8217;re usually pretty [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jun 2007 16:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/#comment-320</guid>
		<description>Scapulomancy!

I wonder if -mancy is cognate to Latin mens or mentis : mind, thought, intention, intellect?

Awesome site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scapulomancy!</p>
<p>I wonder if -mancy is cognate to Latin mens or mentis : mind, thought, intention, intellect?</p>
<p>Awesome site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/#comment-302</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 May 2007 15:38:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/#comment-302</guid>
		<description>-mancy is also being hijacked for use in games and stories dealing with magic in general.  For example, a webcomic about a fantasy boardgame world: &lt;a href="http://www.giantitp.com/comics/erf0040.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Erfworld&lt;/a&gt; has created the words "Stuffamancy" and "Lookamancy" and many others implying not divination, but simply "magic dealing with X".

In fantasy role playing -mancy half the time is used correctly because it is using historical words, but in new formations it tends to have the "magic dealing with-" meaning instead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>-mancy is also being hijacked for use in games and stories dealing with magic in general.  For example, a webcomic about a fantasy boardgame world: <a href="http://www.giantitp.com/comics/erf0040.html" rel="nofollow">Erfworld</a> has created the words &#8220;Stuffamancy&#8221; and &#8220;Lookamancy&#8221; and many others implying not divination, but simply &#8220;magic dealing with X&#8221;.</p>
<p>In fantasy role playing -mancy half the time is used correctly because it is using historical words, but in new formations it tends to have the &#8220;magic dealing with-&#8221; meaning instead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/#comment-281</link>
		<dc:creator>will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 05:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/#comment-281</guid>
		<description>That's actually kinda cool, in my opinion.  Lots of people are aware of how they're used, but very few recognize them as such.  

I'm sorry you have to deal with it, though.  I'm having trouble imagining teaching it to Third Graders, that must be an interesting curriculum.  

Thanks for the interesting comment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s actually kinda cool, in my opinion.  Lots of people are aware of how they&#8217;re used, but very few recognize them as such.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sorry you have to deal with it, though.  I&#8217;m having trouble imagining teaching it to Third Graders, that must be an interesting curriculum.  </p>
<p>Thanks for the interesting comment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Damien Riley</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>Damien Riley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 04:53:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/05/22/a-truly-divine-suffix-mancy/#comment-280</guid>
		<description>Derivational suffixes are taught in 3rd grade with accordance to the California Department of Education Content Standards for English Language Arts.  It's a tough concept to teach them, but they get it after much review.  hard to believe such a concept is required teaching at that level.  (I teach 3rd grade)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Derivational suffixes are taught in 3rd grade with accordance to the California Department of Education Content Standards for English Language Arts.  It&#8217;s a tough concept to teach them, but they get it after much review.  hard to believe such a concept is required teaching at that level.  (I teach 3rd grade)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
