<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Censoring the Dictionary, Part Two: Profanity through the eyes of Apple</title>
	<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/04/17/censoring-the-dictionary-part-two-profanity-through-the-eyes-of-apple/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mark James Adams</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/04/17/censoring-the-dictionary-part-two-profanity-through-the-eyes-of-apple/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark James Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/04/17/censoring-the-dictionary-part-two-profanity-through-the-eyes-of-apple/#comment-354</guid>
		<description>I found another word for you, courtesy of Irvine Welsh short stories, to try in Dictionary: fanny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found another word for you, courtesy of Irvine Welsh short stories, to try in Dictionary: fanny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark James Adams</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/04/17/censoring-the-dictionary-part-two-profanity-through-the-eyes-of-apple/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark James Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/04/17/censoring-the-dictionary-part-two-profanity-through-the-eyes-of-apple/#comment-224</guid>
		<description>You're quite thorough in your profanity. ;-)

I was surprised to see that several entries are redacted. Definitely a lot more work than simply removing certain entries. Still, there is basically no point to turning on this feature. Perhaps when you turn it on the dictionary should add _more_ information, like, "Don't use this word in front of grandma but it's okay to say it to your friend Tommy."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re quite thorough in your profanity. ;-)</p>
<p>I was surprised to see that several entries are redacted. Definitely a lot more work than simply removing certain entries. Still, there is basically no point to turning on this feature. Perhaps when you turn it on the dictionary should add _more_ information, like, &#8220;Don&#8217;t use this word in front of grandma but it&#8217;s okay to say it to your friend Tommy.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
