<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Censoring the Dictionary, Part Two: Profanity through the eyes of Apple</title>
	<atom:link href="http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/04/17/censoring-the-dictionary-part-two-profanity-through-the-eyes-of-apple/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/04/17/censoring-the-dictionary-part-two-profanity-through-the-eyes-of-apple/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2012 19:40:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: laba.biz</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/04/17/censoring-the-dictionary-part-two-profanity-through-the-eyes-of-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-1510</link>
		<dc:creator>laba.biz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Sep 2011 06:55:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/04/17/censoring-the-dictionary-part-two-profanity-through-the-eyes-of-apple/#comment-1510</guid>
		<description>It would be interesting making a comparison of different ways of &#039;censoring the dictionaries&#039; all over the world...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting making a comparison of different ways of &#8216;censoring the dictionaries&#8217; all over the world&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark James Adams</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/04/17/censoring-the-dictionary-part-two-profanity-through-the-eyes-of-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark James Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jun 2007 08:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/04/17/censoring-the-dictionary-part-two-profanity-through-the-eyes-of-apple/#comment-354</guid>
		<description>I found another word for you, courtesy of Irvine Welsh short stories, to try in Dictionary: fanny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I found another word for you, courtesy of Irvine Welsh short stories, to try in Dictionary: fanny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark James Adams</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/04/17/censoring-the-dictionary-part-two-profanity-through-the-eyes-of-apple/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark James Adams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/04/17/censoring-the-dictionary-part-two-profanity-through-the-eyes-of-apple/#comment-224</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re quite thorough in your profanity. ;-)

I was surprised to see that several entries are redacted. Definitely a lot more work than simply removing certain entries. Still, there is basically no point to turning on this feature. Perhaps when you turn it on the dictionary should add _more_ information, like, &quot;Don&#039;t use this word in front of grandma but it&#039;s okay to say it to your friend Tommy.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re quite thorough in your profanity. ;-)</p>
<p>I was surprised to see that several entries are redacted. Definitely a lot more work than simply removing certain entries. Still, there is basically no point to turning on this feature. Perhaps when you turn it on the dictionary should add _more_ information, like, &#8220;Don&#8217;t use this word in front of grandma but it&#8217;s okay to say it to your friend Tommy.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

