<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My language is better than yours!  Nyiii!</title>
	<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/01/03/my-language-is-better-than-yours-nyiii/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Of Official English sillyness, painful grammatical errors, and cooked circles of Freedom-Flour : Notes from a Linguistic Mystic</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/01/03/my-language-is-better-than-yours-nyiii/#comment-458</link>
		<dc:creator>Of Official English sillyness, painful grammatical errors, and cooked circles of Freedom-Flour : Notes from a Linguistic Mystic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 20:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/01/03/my-language-is-better-than-yours-nyiii/#comment-458</guid>
		<description>[...] why do they keep arguing these points? Well, as I&#8217;ve said before, when people say nasty things about another language, it&#8217;s generally because they want to say [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] why do they keep arguing these points? Well, as I&#8217;ve said before, when people say nasty things about another language, it&#8217;s generally because they want to say [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: will</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/01/03/my-language-is-better-than-yours-nyiii/#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2007 00:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/01/03/my-language-is-better-than-yours-nyiii/#comment-128</guid>
		<description>Geoff, very good points, and an interesting take on language creation. Everybody's allowed their preferences on language, don't get me wrong.  It's just when preferences start sounding academic, scientific, or official that I start complaining.  Perhaps I need to look into Sanskrit more... :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Geoff, very good points, and an interesting take on language creation. Everybody&#8217;s allowed their preferences on language, don&#8217;t get me wrong.  It&#8217;s just when preferences start sounding academic, scientific, or official that I start complaining.  Perhaps I need to look into Sanskrit more&#8230; :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Geoff</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/01/03/my-language-is-better-than-yours-nyiii/#comment-127</link>
		<dc:creator>Geoff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jan 2007 20:43:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/01/03/my-language-is-better-than-yours-nyiii/#comment-127</guid>
		<description>Are you saying that even though Sanskrit "is of a wonderful. structure; more perfect than the Greek, more copious than Latin..." that doesn't make it the best language? William James is turning in his grave.

Having studied Sanskrit a wee bit, I marvel that anybody ever learned it at all. And yet, people did.

This, I think, is where the creators of artificial languages get messed up. They keep trying to make a better language, where all the loose ends are tied up, when it is the tying up of loose ends that helps people make their languages into what those languages become. So that the most effective way of creating an artificial language would not be designing it, but creating a very small core and seeing what people did with that core when they wanted to say something new.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you saying that even though Sanskrit &#8220;is of a wonderful. structure; more perfect than the Greek, more copious than Latin&#8230;&#8221; that doesn&#8217;t make it the best language? William James is turning in his grave.</p>
<p>Having studied Sanskrit a wee bit, I marvel that anybody ever learned it at all. And yet, people did.</p>
<p>This, I think, is where the creators of artificial languages get messed up. They keep trying to make a better language, where all the loose ends are tied up, when it is the tying up of loose ends that helps people make their languages into what those languages become. So that the most effective way of creating an artificial language would not be designing it, but creating a very small core and seeing what people did with that core when they wanted to say something new.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osman</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/01/03/my-language-is-better-than-yours-nyiii/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>Osman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:55:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/01/03/my-language-is-better-than-yours-nyiii/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>"Another blog i have visited this week was Will’s Linguistics Mystic."

http://www.lingulangu.org/?p=25</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Another blog i have visited this week was Will’s Linguistics Mystic.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.lingulangu.org/?p=25" rel="nofollow">http://www.lingulangu.org/?p=25</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What was up this week? &#187; Linguistics &#38; Languages</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/01/03/my-language-is-better-than-yours-nyiii/#comment-108</link>
		<dc:creator>What was up this week? &#187; Linguistics &#38; Languages</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/01/03/my-language-is-better-than-yours-nyiii/#comment-108</guid>
		<description>[...] Another blog i have visited this week was Will&#8217;s Linguistics Mystic. He wrote about some wrong ideas related to languages such as &#8216;This language is better than the other&#8217;. In fact, the whole post is related to it and i am agree with what he says. The first thing i had learnt at university was this sentence: &#8216;There is no inferior&#8217; language. So what? Enjoy the post! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Another blog i have visited this week was Will&#8217;s Linguistics Mystic. He wrote about some wrong ideas related to languages such as &#8216;This language is better than the other&#8217;. In fact, the whole post is related to it and i am agree with what he says. The first thing i had learnt at university was this sentence: &#8216;There is no inferior&#8217; language. So what? Enjoy the post! [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Osman</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/01/03/my-language-is-better-than-yours-nyiii/#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>Osman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 08:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://linguisticmystic.com/2007/01/03/my-language-is-better-than-yours-nyiii/#comment-107</guid>
		<description>very good post mate! Do you know what was the thing we have learnt in our very first lesson?

"There is no inferior language"

So, whenever i see some people talking about 'the best' language, i am really surprised at them. The worst thing is that they never accept my ideas and acclaim that some languages are better than others. Well, it totally depends on the person himself. There may be a 'best' language for himself but doing generalization is impossible.
my two cents ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very good post mate! Do you know what was the thing we have learnt in our very first lesson?</p>
<p>&#8220;There is no inferior language&#8221;</p>
<p>So, whenever i see some people talking about &#8216;the best&#8217; language, i am really surprised at them. The worst thing is that they never accept my ideas and acclaim that some languages are better than others. Well, it totally depends on the person himself. There may be a &#8216;best&#8217; language for himself but doing generalization is impossible.<br />
my two cents ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
