<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.3" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Stall-Door Grammarians strike back!</title>
	<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2006/11/13/the-stall-door-grammarians-strike-back/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 00:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: So two professors walk into a bar&#8230; : Notes from a Linguistic Mystic</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2006/11/13/the-stall-door-grammarians-strike-back/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>So two professors walk into a bar&#8230; : Notes from a Linguistic Mystic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Jan 2007 22:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://linguisticmystic.com/2006/11/13/the-stall-door-grammarians-strike-back/#comment-123</guid>
		<description>[...] I&#8217;ve touched on the difference between descriptivism and prescriptivism a few times before (here, here and here), but I think it&#8217;s time for a formal discussion of the differences. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] I&#8217;ve touched on the difference between descriptivism and prescriptivism a few times before (here, here and here), but I think it&#8217;s time for a formal discussion of the differences. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8220;EMINEM!&#8221;, or, a brief foray into psychology &#187; Notes from a Linguistic Mystic</title>
		<link>http://linguisticmystic.com/2006/11/13/the-stall-door-grammarians-strike-back/#comment-79</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8220;EMINEM!&#8221;, or, a brief foray into psychology &#187; Notes from a Linguistic Mystic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 07:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://linguisticmystic.com/2006/11/13/the-stall-door-grammarians-strike-back/#comment-79</guid>
		<description>[...] This post contains some objectionable language.  That&#8217;s the nature of the beast when discussing graffiti, but still, keep that in mind. Perhaps I have too much free time, but I&#8217;m starting to realize that senseless graffiti is truly fascinating.  However, I take heart in the fact that I&#8217;m not alone (for my Linguistics in US Society class, one paper option was to write about bathroom graffiti on campus).  I&#8217;ve written two other posts about it already (here and here), and the more I look around, the more interesting examples I see.  However, last week, I saw something that really, truly threw me. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] This post contains some objectionable language.  That&#8217;s the nature of the beast when discussing graffiti, but still, keep that in mind. Perhaps I have too much free time, but I&#8217;m starting to realize that senseless graffiti is truly fascinating.  However, I take heart in the fact that I&#8217;m not alone (for my Linguistics in US Society class, one paper option was to write about bathroom graffiti on campus).  I&#8217;ve written two other posts about it already (here and here), and the more I look around, the more interesting examples I see.  However, last week, I saw something that really, truly threw me. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
